Composition based on Pimenov's painting "dispute". Composition based on the painting by Pimenov "Dispute How to come up with a conflict based on the painting

Pimenov is a famous artist of the Soviet era who created amazing works. They attract with their simplicity, bright and light colors, optimistic stories. He loved to depict the everyday life of people, the simple everyday life of his contemporaries, endowing each of his paintings with notes of lyricism and charm. Such a canvas is a painting by Y. Pimenov Spor.

Painting by Pimenov Spore

In the lesson on the painting by Pimenov Dispute in the 8th grade, we got acquainted in more detail with the work of the author and now we will write ours, working on the description of the picture. So, in the picture, I see young people. It seems to me that this is a student and a student. They sit at a table with plates on it. Most likely, now there is a big break between the couples and they ran into the cafeteria to have a snack.

We look at the picture, and we see nothing unusual. It looks like the usual interior of the Soviet era, where the bare monophonic walls, painted in a light gray shade. An ordinary table, simple chairs, a tile floor, which was laid out in the usual checkerboard pattern for that time. The students themselves are also dressed simply but tastefully. A girl in a strict suit of a chocolate shade, a guy in a blue-gray suit. Everything would be usual and not interesting, if not for one thing, but.

In Pimenov's painting, the Dispute, young people argue hotly about something. Small details testify to this. Here we see the guy leaned forward with his body, tilted his head and raised his hand, gesturing in order to prove his case. However, his interlocutor is in no hurry to agree with him, because she has her own view and her own truth. The girl also tries to insist on her point of view with the help of gestures.

The history of the painting

If we talk about the history of the creation of the painting Spor Pimenov, then little is known. The artist painted this picture in 1968. The author always wanted to be original and most modern, and therefore tried to portray everyday life. So in the painting Spore, the author depicts the youth of the sixties, capturing on the canvas a part of their life, a certain moment that he stopped, conveying to us the completeness of the picture, its charm and fullness.

You look at the canvas, and pictures from our life come to mind. Who didn't argue? Yes, every person, probably at least once, has been in a verbal skirmish. But each of this dispute came out differently.

Judging by the picture, the young people are intelligent and they will definitely get out of the situation with dignity, remaining friends. But what should we do when we find ourselves in such situations, so that the dispute does not destroy human relations with the interlocutor? This will help the memo for disputants, which we will compose according to the picture.

Considering the picture of Pimenov Spor, I would like to write a memo for the disputants, which will help to remain human and not lose your friends if views and opinions differ.

So, you need not only to express your point of view, but also to learn to listen and hear the interlocutor. In a conversation, you do not need to switch to an increased ton, and even more so, you should not switch to an insulting and humiliating speech. If your opinions do not agree in any way, everyone has the right to remain with their views, which means that you need to learn how to get out of this situation with dignity. By the way, if you see that your opinion is wrong, nothing will happen to you if you admit defeat in the dispute.

There is not a single person who would never enter into friendly arguments while sitting over a cup of coffee. One of such life situations is shown in the painting by Y. Pimenov "The Dispute", written by the author in 1968.

In the foreground of the painting are two friends. They sit on simple stools at a metal table with thin legs. The girl on the right is wearing a long brown sweater, jeans and high black boots. The girl's red hair is pulled back with a black barrette. To her left sits a young man who looks like a friend of the girl. He is in a blue suit and black shoes. He has dark hair and pale skin. Young people gesticulate, actively communicating.

The background of the painting shows gray walls and floors covered with beige and brown tiles. Judging by the furnishings and dishes on the table of the arguing people, this place is a student canteen.

The picture was written by the author with positive emotions, the argument between two friends seems to be a fascinating and active conversation. They do not quarrel, they just discuss something on which they have different opinions. This can be seen on the faces of the heroes of the picture. The author gives lightness and beauty to the everyday plot, creating an interesting action from it in his picture.

The plot of the picture is simple and partly banal: it captures a dispute between two people - a guy and a young girl. The time interval of what is happening is 60-70 years of the last century. As you can understand from the environment, most likely events unfold in the cafeteria of an educational institution or other "government" institution. This is evidenced by the typical for that time gray-blue walls without decor and luxury, covered with ordinary oil paint, a tiled floor in the order of a "checkerboard", budgetary and practical furniture - tables and stools with metal legs. Unremarkable simple interior, so typical for most catering establishments of those years.

What do we see in this picture? A couple is sitting at the table: a guy and a very young girl. Her reddish hair is pulled back at the back of her head and is pinned up with a bow barrette, and her bangs are trimmed straight. She is wearing a formal suit of dark fabrics with a skirt that reaches to the knees, high boots without heels. Opposite the pensive girl, we see her interlocutor - a dark-haired guy in a gray suit and patent leather boots. Everything suggests that we are faced with ordinary students who do not have the means for excesses: they are dressed modestly, but tastefully.

A lively conversation ensued between the young people. However, this is clearly a peaceful dialogue, where everyone can express their point of view and defend it, giving all sorts of arguments without switching to rudeness, insult and humiliation of the interlocutor. At the moment captured in the picture, the guy just argues his point of view, doing it extremely emotionally. This can be understood by paying attention, among other things, to the position of his body: the movement of the hands, a slight tilt of the head, the right leg set aside, and so on. He clearly looks confident in his indisputable righteousness, feels and anticipates his imminent victory over his opponent. The girl, on the other hand, behaves very restrained and looks more constrained and tense. The index finger is pressed to the chin, the back is straight, the position of the head - everything suggests that her arguments have already been exhausted and she is hastily trying to figure out what words can be used to defend her position and get out of an awkward situation. The girl thought, she is focused on the argument and hardly notices anything else from what is happening around. However, judging by the posture and gaze directed towards the interlocutor, she is far from indifferent to the essence of the dialogue, just like the arguments given by the opponent sitting opposite.

The author managed to portray what is happening so accurately that everyone who sees the picture will be able to understand the essence of what is happening without words. Gestures, clothes, postures - everything suggests that we are faced with intelligent young people, perhaps talking about the upcoming session or the latest news. Their dialogue does not go beyond what is permissible and does not turn into swearing, although there is a noticeable note of tension inherent in any dispute.

The title of the picture speaks for itself. It depicts an argument between a young guy and a girl. Most likely, they are studying at some institute, and went to have a bite to eat in the cafeteria. This is a typical dining room with blue-gray painted walls, black and white checkerboard flooring and simple tables and stools. The dining room is unremarkable and similar to dozens of other similar establishments.

At the table sits a girl with reddish hair, dressed in a brown suit and black boots. She has straight-cropped bangs that reach almost to her eyebrows, and her hair is pulled back with a barrette or bow. Opposite the girl is a young guy with dark hair, in a gray suit and black boots. They are dressed without any frills, but with taste.

Judging by the movements of their hands, they are arguing animatedly about something. This is a peaceful dispute, where everyone expresses his point of view and proves it, while not moving on to mutual insults. The girl holds her chin with one hand, as if she is thinking about something and looking for an answer to her opponent's remark. No one wants to give in, but the young man's arguments seem to be more solid, so the girl did not immediately find a compelling argument to defend her position and thought about it. They sit in the dining room and argue, and during this occupation they are completely oblivious to their surroundings.

The guy gives more reasoned answers and most likely he will win the argument. The girl thought, and it is not a fact that she will find an answer to the words of her interlocutor. Yu. Pimenov was able to so subtly depict what is happening in his picture that any person looking at it will immediately understand what its essence is and what is depicted on it. The hand movements of young people indicate that they are intelligent people who respect the opinion of another person. Their dispute does not turn into swearing, they are associates and simply share their impressions and opinions.

Lesson p Russian language .

Composing comparative ha cancer tera based on the painting by Yu. I. Pimenov “ Dispute ”

Lesson objectives :

prepare teachingfor a comparative essay based on the painting by Yu. I. Pimenov “Dispute”;

to consolidate information about the speech situation and give the concept of non-verbal communication - the language of gestures, facial expressions, postures;

to form the ability to draw up a comparative description of characters based on their appearance, facial expressions, behavior in a certain speech situation;

teach students to use comparative language means, update and enrich portrait vocabulary;

to acquaint with the basic rules of dispute;

contribute to the formation of cultural competence: to give an idea of ​​the national traditions of the behavior of the British, Japanese and other peoples during a dispute.

Lesson equipment:

painting reproduction Yu. I. Pimenova “ Dispute”;

computer, projector.

During the classes.

Organizational moment.

Today we have an unusual lesson, a lesson in the development of speech. We bring to your attention a scene.

Scene.

In the class, when discussing candidates for the position of class commander, a dispute arose: which of the two candidates (Sergei or Nastya) to nominate.

Adele: I believe that Sergei should be the commander of our class. He's an excellent student!

Nadira: Why is this, Sergei! Let it be Nastya. She is the trendiest girl in our class.

Adele: Still, I am convinced that Sergei. He always brings things to the end. And you can't always rely on Nastya.

Nadira: Yes, Sergei never lets you cheat on your homework. And in general, you just like him.

Adele: Like,I don’t like it, it’s nothing to do with it. But understand that Nastya often misses school due to illness, and besides, in the second quarter she leaves for a sanatorium.

Nadira: So what. You are not right. After all, she is my best friend.

Adele: Sergei is a relatively free person and can do cool things more thoroughly. All the guys in our class think so. So Sergey should be the commander of our class ..

Nadira: No. I disagree. And in general, Nastya and I will invite Sergei to our birthday, but you are not! You are just jealous of Nastya.

Conversation.

What did you guys see?

How do the parties to the dispute behave?

Which of them evokes your sympathy and why?

Whose behavior during the argument did you dislike? Why?

In the first case, you spoke about the behavior of which person?

In the second case?

And what does it mean to be a cultured person?

There are many indicators of human culture, and one of them is the ability to argue!

What do you think we are going to do in the lesson today? (talk about how to argue.)

Look at the picture?

What do you see? Whom do you see7

What are they doing? (talking.)

What can we suggest? (argue.)

How can you find out? (observe the geois, describe the behavior of the heroes, carefully examine the picture.)

How can you watch the heroes? (compare, describe.)

Would you like to compare the behavior of the characters?

Let's try to compare the characters and draw conclusions about how to behave during an argument, and how undesirable.

And the picture of Yu.I. Pimenov will help us with this“ Dispute” .

4. Write down the number and topic in your notebooks. .

5.A story about the artist.

Eachonce, whenI amintroducingyou, guys, withcreativity of the artist, I really want you to understand what is its uniqueness. Yuri Ivanovich Pimenov (1903-1977) is called the master of the pictorial novel.

Yu. I. Pimenov's talent as a storyteller manifests itself in the titles of works, which are often the key to the content of the picture: "Marusya, it's time to have dinner!"

You ask, what is extraordinary, “unseen” in these ordinary life scenes? On this occasion, Pimenov himself wrote: “The world is full of poetry and beauty, which we often do not notice. To show the beauty of everyday life, the beauty of simple things is my task as an artist ”.

Yes, he possessed a precious quality: the ability to make the ordinary non-conventional, that is, to expand the boundaries of the poetic, to make one feel the poetry of the surrounding everyday life, thereby to teach to appreciate every moment, to take care of life. Isn't this one of the honorable tasks of art ?!

By order of Pimenov, his interest in people, their spiritual life, their relationships led his work to the theme "Meetings and Conversations" (series of paintings "Date"). He watched people on the street, in a trolleybus, in a cafe. One of the best paintings in this series - "Dispute" (1968)

Painting conversation

Are you interested in this picture?

What artistic means does the author of the painting use to show that we are faced with debaters, people with different points of view?

Where do young people argue? What details make it possible to judge this?

Describe the interior?

What are the features of the color of the canvas?

What do you think the boy and the girl are arguing about? What problems can they worry about?

Let's take a close look at the heroes of the picture. Describe the girl.

What is your idea of ​​the heroine?

Describe the young man's appearance.

What impression does the young man make?

Do you think the young man is confident in himself? How is he holding up?

So, you have already noticed that the guys differently behave during an argument. What were the details behind this impression?

That is, on the basis of understanding what language? Remember from rhetoric?

Is that correct, based on your understanding of the language of non-verbal communication?

What does verbal mean?

What does this language allow for the speaker?

Give examples from your life wholesale to confirm this.

6. Exercise for a minute.

7. Orthographic work.

Returning to the language of non-verbal communication, using its elements, characterize a boy and a girl. Write down examples in the table. Try to use short adjectives and short participles.

Which important quality can be noted in the girl?

What can you say about the young man as a debater?

Is he ready to understand the issues discussed?

Is this scene from the life of young people of the 60s of the last century relevant for us?

What sayings of proverbs, aphorisms about the dispute do you know?

You study English? How do the British behave during a dispute?

The Japanese, on the other hand, often use non-verbal communication during an argument.

In our country and republic, disputes are necessary to clarify the truth, they bring people closer together, and sometimes make them friends.

8. Vocabulary and stylistic work in groups.

Find synonyms for the word dispute and give them an interpretation.

Form nouns indicating persons participating in a dispute, dispute, polemics.

Give an interpretation to the words posture, profile, gesture, facial expressions (portrait vocabulary).

Remember the linguistic means that are used to express the similarity of objects.

Remember the linguistic means that are used to express the difference between objects.

9. Systematization of the material. Drawing up a plan.

What way of matching is possible in this case?

What are the differences between young people and what are the similarities?

What artistic means allow the author to express their thoughts?

10. An approximate plan.

1. Introduction. A young man and a girl are the heroes of the painting "Dispute" by Yu. I. Pimenov

2. Disputants.

a) General features.

b) Differences.

c) artistic means.

3. Output. About the culture of the dispute.

What can you say in the final part of the essay?

What is the best way to behave during an argument?

11. There is a model on the board.

Do not offend

Listen

Do not interrupt

Reproduction of the painting "Dispute"

Do not be rude

Do not humiliate

Do not shout

Do not offend

12. Reflection.

What did we do in class today?

What new have you learned and what have you learned?

13. Submission of grades.

14.Homework: Write an essay using the memo for people who want to master the culture of controversy (distribute the memo to students).